51%攻撃
51%攻撃とは、単一の主体がブロックチェーンのマイニングパワーの過半数を支配することで発生する攻撃です。
The feasibility of a 51% attack depends heavily on the total hash rate of the network. On a small, niche PoW chain with low total mining power, an attacker could potentially rent enough hash power (via services like NiceHash) to execute the attack for a few hours. On a major network like Bitcoin, the physical acquisition of enough ASICs (Application-Specific Integrated Circuits) and the necessary electricity would cost billions of dollars, making the attack financially irrational—the attacker would essentially destroy the value of the network they just invested billions in to control.
graph LR
Center["51%攻撃"]:::main
Pre_consensus_mechanisms["consensus-mechanisms"]:::pre --> Center
click Pre_consensus_mechanisms "/terms/consensus-mechanisms"
Pre_proof_of_work["proof-of-work"]:::pre --> Center
click Pre_proof_of_work "/terms/proof-of-work"
Pre_proof_of_stake["proof-of-stake"]:::pre --> Center
click Pre_proof_of_stake "/terms/proof-of-stake"
Rel_double_spending["double-spending"]:::related -.-> Center
click Rel_double_spending "/terms/double-spending"
Rel_sybil_attack["sybil-attack"]:::related -.-> Center
click Rel_sybil_attack "/terms/sybil-attack"
Rel_hard_fork["hard-fork"]:::related -.-> Center
click Rel_hard_fork "/terms/hard-fork"
classDef main fill:#7c3aed,stroke:#8b5cf6,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold,rx:5,ry:5;
classDef pre fill:#0f172a,stroke:#3b82f6,color:#94a3b8,rx:5,ry:5;
classDef child fill:#0f172a,stroke:#10b981,color:#94a3b8,rx:5,ry:5;
classDef related fill:#0f172a,stroke:#8b5cf6,stroke-dasharray: 5 5,color:#94a3b8,rx:5,ry:5;
linkStyle default stroke:#4b5563,stroke-width:2px;
🧒 5歳でもわかるように説明
もし、教室の半分以上の人が「昨日は休みだった」とウソをついたら、それが正しいことになってしまいます。それと同じで、半数以上のパワーを持つ人が悪いことをしようとすると、誰も止められなくなります。
🤓 Expert Deep Dive
Technically, a 51% attack is an exploit of the Nakamoto Consensus 'Longest Chain Rule'. When an attacker controls >50% hashrate, they can generate a private version of the blockchain faster than the rest of the network combined. By keeping this fork secret and then 'releasing' it once it is longer than the public chain, the network is forced to follow the attacker's chain due to the rules of 'Chainwork'. This results in a 'Chain Reorganization' (reorg). The primary damage is the ability to 'Double-Spend' by broadcasting a transaction on the public chain, waiting for confirmation, then releasing the private chain where that transaction never happened.